- Air Quality Monitoring
- Bristol City Council's Plans to Improve Air Quality
- Clean Air Zones
- Links with other Projects and Policies
- Non - Charging Measures to Improve Air Quality
- The Air Quality Problem
This is an excerpt from the Health Matters report by Public Health England.
NO2 is a gas that is produced along with nitric oxide (NO) by combustion processes. Together they are often referred to as oxides of nitrogen (NOx).
The Department for Environment, Food & Rural Affairs (Defra) estimates that 80% of NOx emissions in areas where the UK is exceeding NO2 limits are due to transport, with the largest source being emissions from diesel cars and vans. Other sources include power generation, industrial processes, and domestic heating.
The Committee on the Medical Effects of Air Pollutants (COMEAP) has established that short-term exposure to NO2, particularly at high concentrations, is a respiratory irritant that can cause inflammation of the airways leading to – for example – cough, production of mucus and shortness of breath. Studies have shown associations of NO2 in outdoor air with reduced lung development, and respiratory infections in early childhood and effects on lung function in adulthood.
Epidemiological studies have also shown associations of outdoor NO2 with adverse effects on health, including reduced life expectancy. It has been unclear whether these effects are caused by NO2 itself, or by other pollutants emitted at the same time by sources such as road traffic.
There are three key phases of the Plan.
- Strategic Outline Case (Shortlisting options): ended March 2018;
- Outline Business Case (Detailed study of options) – 2019
- Full Business case (Preferred Scheme and mitigations) – 2019
Phase one developed and analysed a wide range of possible options to improve air quality in the shortest possible time. A long list of options was reviewed and screened to get to a short list of packages. We have published our shortlist of packages as part of the Strategic Outline Case (SOC) on our website.
In Phase two (April 2018 – 2019), we will carry out a technical assessment of the short-listed packages, assessing them against a range of outcomes (impact on air quality, health, traffic, equality, etc). We will also carry out extensive engagement work to get the views of residents, commuters, and other stakeholders on our packages, to make sure we’ve not missed anything important. This will enable us to select a preferred package of measures and determine how that package will be implemented, which will be presented in the Outline Business Case (OBC). We will also bid to government for both implementation and mitigation funding at this stage.
Phase three (2019) will involve fine-tuning of the preferred package of measures. We will engage with you to decide on the final details of design and implementation of the preferred package. This will allow us to put forward a final bid to the Government, in our Full Business Case (FBC), for funding to deliver the preferred package in 2019 – 2020.
We are considering a CAZ and a diesel car ban as part of our Clean Air Plan, though a decision to have a CAZ has not yet been made. in the text below, “CAZ boundary” also refers to the boundary for the potential diesel car ban.
The size of a potential CAZ has not yet been confirmed. We are currently testing two possible boundaries – a “Medium” and a “Small” – please see the map showing the indicative boundaries which will be used in the modelling. The modelling will determine the optimum size needed to achieve compliance with air quality standards in the shortest time possible.
It is important to note that just because an area is not included within the CAZ boundary, it does not mean that air quality is of a lower priority here, or that the air is currently clean in that area. Although the CAZ is geographically defined, a CAZ will have the effect of cleaning up the vehicle fleet across the whole city and region because polluting vehicles will be charged to drive in those areas where there is the most demand to travel (the central area) and hence people will change their vehicle sooner than they otherwise would, or use a cleaner mode (if we decide to charge cars). The CAZ will also deter “through” trips for polluting vehicles, again improving air quality on the arterial routes that pass through areas that are not within the bounds of the CAZ.
We are also assessing, through traffic modelling, the impact of displacement, i.e. the extent to which drivers will try to avoid the zone by driving round it – and possibly increasing pollution in the non CAZ areas that border the CAZ. The medium zone reduces displacement in comparison with the small because it is further to drive to avoid the zone.
The boundaries of the CAZ are determined by assessing its desired effect on driver behaviour rather than purely ambient air quality levels.
In summary, just because the CAZ boundary does not include an area, it does not follow that the area will not benefit from the CAZ. We intend to ensure that everywhere within the city complies with the EU standards for pollution in the shortest time possible.
The measures on the long list have been assessed against a set of criteria provided by the government’s Joint Air Quality Unit (JAQU). These criteria are based on the HM Treasury Green Book.
Firstly, measures unlikely to achieve NO2 compliance within the timeframe were removed from the long list. Remaining measures were then assessed against a multitude of criteria, including: public health impacts; social impacts; economic impacts and scheme cost. A copy of the scoring table for each measure against the assessment criteria is available as part of the Strategic Outline Business Case.
Despite the short time frame, we want to ensure you have plenty of opportunity to ask questions and offer your views. Along with a formal consultation period later in the year, we’ll continually talk to as many people as possible from April 2018, starting with a series of drop-in sessions, workshops and other events.
We’ll also build on the regular contact we’ve had with interested parties over the past months. This dedicated web page, a regular newsletter and social media activity will also keep you informed.
Throughout, we’ll liaise with neighbouring local authorities and the West of England Combined Authority (WECA), recognising that solutions will undoubtedly involve our partners.
To find out more, you can:
- Sign up to receive our regular newsletter by emailing us at email@example.com
- Check the website for regular updates
- Follow us on social media (Twitter, Facebook)
- Come talk to us at one of our events.
- Email us on the address above with your queries
A Clean Air Zone is a new mechanism proposed by the government to help cities tackle air pollution. It is a defined geographical area which requires polluting vehicle owners to pay a charge on entry to or movement within it. The charge is based on vehicle Euro standards. The aim is to accelerate the improvement in emissions of the vehicle fleet.
Charges would not affect every vehicle, just those that do not comply with levels set by government (see questions 2 & 3 for further information). Further information on the levels set by government can be found in the Clean Air Zone Framework, which sets out principles that should be followed when setting up a CAZ in England.
A CAZ is being considered in Bristol as part of a package of measures aiming to reduce air pollution to legal limits in the shortest time possible.
A decision has not been made to charge vehicles driving in Bristol. The feasibility study for Bristol’s Clean Air Plan recommends several options that can help improve air quality in Bristol to meet legal limits. Some of these options involve Clean Air Zones of varying geographies and classes. These options will be developed further over the rest of 2018, with plenty of opportunities for the public and stakeholders to provide input. The government guidance for the study requires that we use a CAZ as a benchmark option.
Yes. Government guidelines set out different classes of Clean Air Zones, which charge different groups of vehicles. These CAZ classes are shown below:
- Class A – Bus; coach; taxi and private hire
- Class B – Bus; coach; Heavy Goods Vehicle (HGV); taxi and private hire
- Class C – Bus; coach; HGV; large van; minibus; small van/light commercial; taxi and private hire
- Class D – Bus; coach; HGV; large van; minibus; small van/light commercial; cars, taxis and private hire
The Government guidance requires the CAZ classes above to be assessed in that order of preference (class A, then class B, etc). This means that a higher class of CAZ can only be considered if the lower class will not improve air quality in Bristol enough to meet legal requirements.
Whichever class is chosen, Euro 4 petrol (approx. 2006) vehicles or a Euro 6 diesel (approx. 2015) vehicles would not be charged, nor would electric or hydrogen powered vehicles.
Further information can be found in the Clean Air Zone Framework, which sets out principles that should be followed when setting up a CAZ in England.
European ‘Euro’ emission standards aim to reduce levels of harmful exhaust emissions, by defining acceptable exhaust emission limits which become more stringent over time. Euro standards were first introduced in 1992 with Euro 1, when catalytic converters became compulsory on new cars. Euro 6 is the most recent standard.
Unfortunately, there is no centralised official website and this is new territory for both local authorities and the government. We have asked government to provide this and this will be in place by the time the first CAZ is operating.
Transport for London‘s online tool allows people to find out if their vehicle will be charged in the Ultra-Low Emission Zone:. This is not a definitive source of information.
To get a definitive answer to which Euro standard your vehicle is, please check with the vehicle manufacturer. Generally, if your vehicle is registered before these dates, you would be charged to enter a Clean Air Zone:
- Diesel: September 2015
- Petrol: Jan 2006
- Electric/Hydrogen – Exempt
- Hybrid – by EURO class
However, it is best to check, as this will not apply to all vehicles
In our feasibility study, we considered three sizes of Clean Air Zones. These were:
- A large zone – this was roughly the Bristol urban area within the boundary of the M4 and M5 and excluding areas within Bath and North East Somerset (BANES) and North Somerset.
- A medium zone, roughly the Air Quality Management Area. Two other variations of the medium zone were considered, to include two smaller Air Quality Management Areas in South Gloucestershire Council (but within the city of Bristol).
- A small zone, within the inner ring road.
These boundaries have now been refined and are shown in this map.
Small changes to the boundary could be possible, but significant changes would mean that modelling would need to be re – run to ensure that no unintended consequences occur.
There were five shortlisted options from the SOC:
- A package of non-charging interventions
- A medium sized class C (all vehicles except cars) charging option with complementary non-charging interventions
- A medium sized class D (all vehicles) charging option with complementary non-charging interventions
- A small sized class C (all vehicles except cars) charging option with complementary non-charging interventions
- A small sized class D (all vehicles) charging option with complementary non-charging interventions
The Council has a number of powers, but we are nevertheless constrained in a number of ways, requiring the co-operation of transport operators and the general public and more funding for improved infrastructure. Air quality is a national problem and therefore needs a coordinated approach to ensure standards in different cities are consistent and fair while cutting harmful emissions as much as possible.
We are ready to introduce changes which will make a positive difference to this significant public health problem in our city. The funding available is for measures that deliver air quality improvements in the shortest time possible, and mitigation for those adversely affected by measures to deliver compliance. This is the main reason why measures that take a long time to implement (such as a large Clean Air Zone, and large infrastructure schemes of the scale of Metrobus) are not being considered further as part of this Plan.
There is too much uncertainty to give a date for when a Clean Air Zone be implemented, should that be the outcome of the technical work being undertaken 2018-19. The timescale will be dependent on the scheme selected and the many factors influencing difficulty of implementation. We believe that the soonest any of the UK cities can achieve implementation of a CAZ will be 2021. Bristol started after the first wave of cities so it is likely to be after that. Bristol will aim to achieve compliance in the shortest time possible.
Bristol City Council is following Defra’s Clean Air Zone Framework to prepare the Clean Air Plan. Regarding the duration of a CAZ, the Framework states that:
‘Where air quality has improved to the level required and there is evidence that this improvement would be maintained, the Government expects local authorities to remove the elements of the zone that are no longer required at the earliest opportunity.’
A CAZ or diesel car ban would be enforced using Automatic Number Plate Recognition (ANPR) cameras placed at entry/exit points and within the CAZ. These cameras will capture vehicle movement on the monitored road(s) enabling chargeable vehicles to be determined. The exact locations and number of ANPR cameras will be determined as the Plan progresses, with plenty of opportunity for the public and stakeholders to have their say. The council already uses ANPR to enforce traffic regulations. The project will assess what new cameras and infrastructure are needed to enforce a CAZ, if it is needed.
Clean Air Zones are similar to but not the same as Low Emission Zones. Clean Air Zones are intended to incorporate more than just restrictions to the most polluting vehicles. They will include other measures designed to complement a CAZ and, where possible, to mitigate some of the negative impacts. To ensure that we are consistent with other cities in the UK, we must use the Government’s Clean Air Zone Framework rather than a city-specific LEZ. This consistency helps businesses to better adapt to the changes and avoids confusion for those travelling between different cities.
Each city has locally unique information about their air quality problems and likely future scenarios. Although air quality is a problem in many UK cities the degree of the exceedances (of legal limits), and the significance of certain sources varies greatly. Any action must be proportionate to the severity of the air quality problem. Hence, a CAZ may be required in one city but not another.
Congestion and air pollution are related but are not the same. Clean Air Zones are designed to improve air quality to meet legal requirements and therefore focus on tackling polluting vehicles. A congestion charge does not distinguish between vehicles based on pollution, but aims to reduce the total number of vehicles on the road or within an area. A Clean Air Zone may indeed impact on congestion, but this is likely to only be in the short-term whilst vehicles are upgraded to cleaner models or people adjust their travel choices.
This is yet to be determined and will be assessed over the coming months, with inputs from technical traffic modelling work and our engagement work. Our understanding is that a diesel car ban would only operate a maximum of 8 hours in any 24 hour period.
It is likely that a CAZ will involve charging vehicles on a day-by-day basis. This means if you drive within the zone in any new 24 hr period you will be charged. There would not be a charge if a vehicle is parked within the zone and does not move. This will be discussed further during our public and stakeholder engagement work.
This is still to be determined. It is expected that there will be an online system, with the Government intending to produce a national, centralised system to process charges so that the overhead costs for all the local authorities required to implement a Clean Air Zone are minimised. The council would run any processes connected with levying fines for non payment of a CAZ charge, or contravening of a diesel car ban.
The aim of the CAZ is to reduce NO2 concentrations within the city rather than reduce traffic levels. However, the CAZ may alter traffic from the present levels in the short term, as people adjust their travel choices. The difference in traffic would depend on what type of CAZ is implemented i.e. there is likely to be more of an impact on traffic if all vehicles including cars (Class D) were charged compared to a Class A being charged. Potentially, there will be a reduction in traffic on the roads within and approaching the CAZ as not everyone will have a compliant vehicle and/or be willing to pay the charge.
However, any congestion improvements are likely to be short term only. As vehicles are replaced with cleaner models and can drive within the zone without charge, traffic levels are likely to return to current levels or change in line with predictions.
Health and air quality improvements are the key aims of a CAZ. However, there is potential for a CAZ to bring secondary benefits.
If fewer people are developing health problems than before then this could provide economic savings to the NHS and economic benefits from reduced absenteeism. It is also possible that some measures included as part of a CAZ will create better conditions / infrastructure / facilities for cyclists and pedestrians in Bristol, leading to public health benefits arising from increased active travel.
A Clean Air Zone could also improve the attractiveness of Bristol in the long term, as a healthier place to live, work and visit.
This is a risk, but we are aiming to achieve compliance with legal requirements across Bristol. As such, any intervention would be designed to prevent creating exceedences of air quality limits elsewhere. There may be small increases in air pollution in new locations, but the aim is to bring the whole city into compliance. Modelling work is being done to assess the risk of traffic displacement.
We have considered this when defining the boundaries of the CAZ and all efforts have been made to avoid this situation from arising. As part of the scheme assessments, traffic modelling was carried out to test the implications of each type and size of CAZ on traffic flows and routes. More detailed modelling will take place within the Outline Business Case which will be worked up over the next few months. As part of the engagement process we will be listening to the suggestions from the public and areas of particular concern can be discussed at events or raised through our social media channels or via email.
We do not know at this stage whether a discount for residents will be included in the final package of measures. Legally, any exemptions or discounts cannot affect the timescale in terms of securing compliance.
However, exemptions and discounts will be considered as part of our assessment and informed by our public engagement work.
To ensure we capture your views we will be holding a number of drop in events, workshops, surgeries and a formal consultation period in 2018. This will provide you with the opportunity to comment as the project progresses and enable us to incorporate your feedback into the Clean Air Plan development.
A range of non-charging measures are being considered in order to mitigate the impacts of the CAZ, including the financial costs to residents living within the zone. The mitigation measures chosen will depend on the size and type of CAZ selected and the number of residents impacted. Government has provided a mitigation fund of £220m (the Clean Air Fund) to help local authorities and Bristol will bid for this funding in autumn 2018. We welcome your ideas to help us form the bid to government.
We are aiming to ensure the final preferred package of measures does not disproportionately impact vulnerable groups of society. At this stage of the project, we are considering various mitigation measures. Exemptions and discounts will be considered as part of our assessment and informed by our public engagement work. To ensure we capture the views of these groups we will be holding a number of drop in events, workshops, surgeries and a formal consultation period in 2019. This will provide opportunities to comment as the project progresses and enable us to incorporate your feedback into the plan development.
Implementing a CAZ could have negative as well as positive impacts for businesses and some businesses may be impacted more than others due to their specific business model and operational requirements. This will be given appropriate consideration as the package of measures is created. To ensure we capture your views we will be holding a number of drop in events, workshops, surgeries and a formal consultation period throughout the year. This will provide you with the opportunity to comment as the project progresses and enable us to incorporate your feedback into the Clean Air Plan development.
Bristol would not be the only UK City to adopt a CAZ. 61 local authorities have been directed to reduce air pollution in the shortest time possible. For example, Bath is also considering introduction of a CAZ and Birmingham and Coventry intend to introduce a CAZ class D. We hope and expect that a cleaner, greener city will improve both residents’ and visitors’ experience of the city.
The purpose of a CAZ is not to generate revenue but to improve the health of local residents by discouraging polluting journeys. We want to deter polluting journeys rather than raise money from them.
The money collected from a CAZ would go to central Government. The costs of running the central system would then be removed and what is left will be circulated to local authorities to cover the local operational costs of running the scheme. If there is any surplus revenue arising from the scheme, the revenue can only legally be re-invested to deliver improvements in local transport. So if there is any surplus money from the scheme it would be reinvested in the scheme itself and in sustainable travel options.
We recognise that emissions from diesel cars are the dominant source of NOx, and that under the “Polluter Pays” principle car manufacturers need to take responsibility for the problem, but securing funds from the industry is outside the control of local authorities. We, along with other local authorities, are discussing how to address this concern with national government.
To meet climate change targets, the Government encouraged the uptake of diesel vehicles based on their lower CO2 emissions. However, NOx emissions from diesel vehicles vary so widely from their type approvals that air quality in cities across Europe has not improved as predicted. The best solution would be for a greater share of journeys done by foot, by bike, or on ultra-low emissions vehicles, but we recognise that this is not possible for all. Encouraging greener modes of transportation including electric vehicles or travel using public transport are options we are exploring as part of the Clean Air Plan package of measures.
The government issued a consultation in the autumn of 2017 to gather views on measures to support motorists, residents and businesses. This included a targeted scrappage scheme for car and van drivers in specific areas across the UK. In the government’s response to the Clean Air Fund consultation it indicated that a national scrappage scheme would not be taken forward. However, our current plan does include a scrappage scheme for non – compliant diesel cars. This would need to be approved and funded by government.
The contribution of lorries and buses to NO2 emissions varies between monitoring sites in Bristol. Overall, diesel cars cause 40% of the air pollution from transport in Bristol, while diesel buses and coaches cause 23% and diesel vans causing 22%. The Government’s Clean Air Zone Framework advises us to consider emissions from buses and HGVs ahead of car emissions, but they are not the sole, or even major source of the problem. The overall aim of Bristol’s Clean Air Plan is to bring about compliance with EU limit values in the shortest possible time. We are therefore considering a range of measures focused on a variety of transport modes.
Current evidence shows that the performance of EURO VI buses and HGV’s is much closer to their type approval ratings than cars.
We recognise that a lot of small businesses in particular will have difficulty converting or replacing small vans or HGVs. Many of these businesses will be based outside Bristol but need to travel into Bristol. We will be engaging with Bristol’s business community throughout the Clean Air Plan’s development to assess the impact of any potential charging zone. We will also continue to liaise with the government, applying for grant funding when it is available, to ensure we can support businesses transition to using low-emission vehicles.
It’s important to consider the impacts of a charging scheme an all sectors of society, and the study will report on this, but we do have to take action to secure improvements in public health which may mean restricting movements of polluting vehicles.
These are a series of measures that will be implemented alongside a Clean Air Zone, or as an alternative to a Clean Air Zone (for example a diesel car ban) in order to further reduce NO2 emissions or mitigate the CAZ impacts. They include: encouraging active travel modes such as cycling, changes to parking systems, encouraging the use of public transport, and investment incentive measures. We will be consulting on these measures as part of our engagement work and we look forward to receiving your suggestions.
The effectiveness of using non-charging measures alone to lower NO2 to legal limits was assessed as part of our technical work. Bristol City Council has achieved some success in reducing car trips over recent years, by promoting use of sustainable travel. Since the Air Quality Action Plan was published in 2004, there has been a sharp increase in cycling and use of public transport in Bristol. However, despite this improvement, demand for travel by car has risen due to population growth and rising economic activity in Bristol. Non-charging measures have not been sufficient to achieve compliance to date.
If we take the example of Metrobus, previous modelling estimated that this very large scheme will lead to a drop of NO2 concentrations by a maximum of 5% at some locations. This is equivalent to approximately 4µg/m3 at Rupert Street. However, at this location a drop of 20-30µg/m3 is required to achieve compliance with legal limits. Additionally, a scheme of the scale of Metrobus has taken 6 years to deliver, from initial planning to completion. This would be too long for meeting the government’s requirement to achieve compliance in the shortest time possible.
To test the impact of using only non-charging measures in Bristol, an ambitious target was assumed for the Clean Air Plan; that a reduction of 5% in traffic levels could be achieved within 2 years. This assessment found that with this level of traffic reduction, the year we expect to achieve compliance would not change from the baseline case (or ‘do nothing’ case) year of 2025.
Sufficient non-charging measures are unlikely to be deliverable in the short term or be quicker to deliver than a charging scheme. The Council has been directed to achieve compliance in the shortest possible time, and therefore non-charging measures will be used to complement a CAZ, or as an alternative to a CAZ, and where possible designed to mitigate impacts.
The Clean Air Plan considers a number of non-charging measures, summarised in the list below, a full list can be found in the SOC.
- Introduction and enforcement of anti-idling zones for buses in the city centre
- Increased Euro Standard requirements for taxis and private hire vehicles in licensing agreements
- Enforcement of mandatory compliance for buses, taxis and private hire vehicles to access bus lanes and / or franchise routes
- Retrofitting of Council and privately-owned waste vehicles
- Provision of grants for taxi, private hire and LGV drivers to upgrade and / or retrofit their vehicles
- Restrictions on goods vehicles movements in the City Centre and / or AQMA during peak hours
- Exclusion of diesel cars from polluted parts of the city
- Traffic management measures to relocate queues on Newfoundland Way southbound to M32 north of Junction 2
- Further optimisation of traffic signal timings across the city
- Targeted traffic management measures on Rupert Street and Bedminster Down Road
- Enhanced traffic controls (soft traffic gating), including real time traffic management system across the city
The Clean Air Plan considers a range of measures that make it easier for residents and visitors in Bristol to make their journeys on cleaner, more sustainable modes of transport.
The final package of measures will be decided by December 2019 and we will be consulting and engaging with as many people as possible as the package is developed. We would like to hear from you about how a Clean Air Zone would affect your journeys, what alternatives you currently have, as well as where you would like to see improvements. Such feedback will help us develop solutions that are fair and robust.
We will hold a series of events such as drop-in sessions, workshops and others as part of our engagement programme We would encourage you to attend and discuss your ideas with our project team at one of these events. Alternatively, if you’d like to find out more about the project or have ideas that you’d like to share with us, please get in touch with us, either via email, our website, or social media.
This is a common suggestion, and the answer is complicated. Evidence from research is mixed. However, even if trees did make a difference the effect would be very small in comparison to the size of the problem and would not deliver compliance in the shortest possible time. Trees of course offer multiple other benefits in urban environments.
Two recent (July 2018) reports from ONS (Office of National Statistics) and AQEG (Air Quality Expert Group) have looked at this issue.
The ONS report found that although vegetation removes significant quantities of air pollution from the atmosphere, and may reduce concentrations of particulate matter by 6 – 10%, the impact on NO2 was insignificant. The ONS report concludes: “Even though vegetation will not solve the whole issue of air quality in the UK, and in some cases vegetation can have adverse effects on air quality, the service of air pollution absorption by vegetation is nevertheless an important one.”
AQEG reviewed research and concluded that “vegetation and trees in particular are regarded as beneficial for air quality, but they are not a solution to the air quality problems at a city scale.”
Some recent research indicates that green infrastructure can protect people from pullution by inhibiting dispersion from nearby roads, though the effect is said to be small.
Bus lanes enable a better bus service for the general public by encouraging a shift in travel option from private vehicles. Work done by BCC in assessing the effect on pollution of the introduction of a showcase route on Fishponds Road showed a small overall improvement in air quality after the introduction of the scheme.
Bus services in Bristol are operated by a number of companies. Whilst the Council subsidises a small number of services, the vast majority are commercial services. BCC can influence the operation of these services through a number of mechanisms (e.g. traffic regulation conditions, bus partnerships) but the level of control is limited.
We have made significant improvements to bus services in recent years. These include:
MetroBus, a rapid public transport system that will provide an express service to key destinations in the area using a combination of segregated busways and lanes, will use low emission vehicles.
Working with the bus companies to reduce the pollution from older buses has led to a retrofit project to reduce emissions from 35 of the most polluting buses from a grant awarded in 2015 and recently Bristol won £2.2m for cleaning up a further 81 buses operating in Bristol and South Gloucestershire..
As part of the Clean Air Plan, we are looking at several non-charging measures that help improve bus services and encourage a shift towards cleaner buses. We will work closely with bus operators, users and other stakeholders to develop and refine these measures as the Plan progresses.
A forthcoming “Bus Deal” in Bristol should help to further clean up Bristol’s fleet but this has yet to be fully agreed.
Defra predictions are based on outputs from their Pollution Climate Mapping (PCM) model which is used to report legal compliance to the EU. The model is calibrated against measured concentrations from the national monitoring network (Defra’s Automatic Urban and Rural Network – AURN), but does not take into consideration all data available from Local Authority monitoring networks. The verification process for the model is therefore reliant on fewer monitoring locations than local models, which can result in over or under estimations in the PCM model. Defra estimates this overarching uncertainty to be in region of +/-29% (Defra AQ Plan – Technical Report, pg 16). This varies by city. Only one monitoring station in Bristol is used for verification of the PCM modelling.
Conversely, local predictions use data from 4 automatic monitoring stations and 105 NO2 diffusion tube monitoring sites across Bristol. The difference between the number of monitoring stations used by each model is the driving factor for the difference in air quality predictions. Defra acknowledge that BCC data more accurately reflects the local circumstances, and this data will be used to determine the most appropriate course of action.
Air quality monitoring in Bristol is comprehensive and long-standing. Bristol’s monitoring network is focused on NO2 as the concentrations of this pollutant near busy roads exceed the health‐based national objectives and European Limit Values. The current air quality situation in Bristol is shown in this map, which shows measurements of NO2 from diffusion tubes and continuous monitors at locations across Bristol.
BCC monitors NOx and NO2 using a combination of automatic “reference method” instruments and non – automatic (passive diffusion tube) monitoring.
The automatic monitoring stations are located at:
- Brislington Depot, Bath Road
- Fishponds Road
- Parson Street School, Parsons Street
- Junction of Wells Road and Airport Road
- Colston Avenue
Further information can be found here.
More monitoring can sometimes help identify specific issues and the existing monitoring network was expanded at the start of 2018 to support monitoring and evaluation of the Clean Air Plan. However, we already have a good picture of the existing air quality problem in Bristol from the extensive monitoring network in the city, which includes real-time monitoring and diffusion tubes. Bristol has more monitoring sites than Birmingham – a much larger city.
The evidence we have already makes it quite clear that action is needed to tackle poor air quality. Details of the existing data are provided in the Air Quality Annual Status Report which can be found here.
Citizen sensing, where citizens use low-cost monitors to take their own measurements of air quality, can often be to raise awareness about air pollution, but the data gathered cannot be used by BCC because the quality of the data is not high enough.
We have followed the Defra Local Air Quality Management Guidance (also referred to as LAQM TG16) when considering which monitoring methods to use. In Bristol, the majority of monitoring that has been carried out to date focuses on NO2 and particulate matter.
NO2 concentrations have been measured in two ways:
- continuous monitoring stations – these record data in real-time, but are expensive to install and maintain.
- diffusion tubes – these are cost-effective monitors that provide a wider coverage of NO2 concentrations but need to be replaced every month and that provide a better spatial coverage of NO2 concentrations.
Both monitoring methods are accepted by LAQM TG16.
All our data is accessible through the air quality dashboard.
The standard of instruments that can be used by local authorities is prescribed in LAQM TG16, and due to the difficulty of measuring concentrations of nitrogen dioxide in the parts per billion range, low cost sensors are not appropriate to use for this pollutant.
Particulate matter can be monitored using a large number of different technologies, but mainly by continuous monitors. Although newer, low-cost sensors have appeared in the market in recent years, they have not all received approval from Defra and large uncertainties remain over their performance.
Where possible we will share the data once it has been approved and verified.
This will be established in the detailed modelling work.
The advice we have from the Joint Air Quality Unit (JAQU) is as follows:
- We would expect the tax treatment of a charge on Clean Air Zones would follow the existing tax treatment of congestion charges and tolls;
- This means a charge would generally be a deductible business expense for the self-employed and an employee on business journeys;
- The approach to give tax relief for qualifying business journeys in Clean Air Zones should be covered by the current rules for travel and expenses.
There is one exception – there would be no tax liability where an employer reimburses an employee for the charge using their own vehicle on a business journey.
HMRC advise there is a lot of detail in the underlying travel rules so there is some more nuance but the position is basically as set out above.
Air pollution and deaths is a complex issue. The fact that air pollution is bad for health is not disputed. Attributing cause and effect with certainty is more problematic. Exposure, the mix of pollutants and the susceptibility of individuals all plays a part.
The death estimates for the UK, and inferred for Bristol (note that 300 is a rounded number so described as “around” or “approximately”), is the outcome of a statistical exercise to estimate the number of lives prematurely ended (life years lost) through exposure to PM and NO2. The calculations from COMEAP and others is one of “life years lost” through exposure – from which an estimate of deaths is then produced. Death certificates do not say that air pollution is the cause, but air pollution contributes to the bringing forward of deaths through worsening heath by a variety of mechanisms. The estimate for Bristol comes from the report commissioned by the City Council from Air Quality Consultants and is on the council website.
COMEAP have recently issued revised guidance on the health burden of nitrogen dioxide (Annex A of Defra’s Technical report). BCC will be using the revised guidance in assessing the public health impact of measures in our Clean Air Plan. The effect of using this revised guidance is likely to be that the baseline figure of 300 deaths per year will be revised downwards because the draft guidance includes a smaller coefficient of mortality for nitrogen dioxide.
The method of calculating life years lost and attributable deaths is described on this blog from the Winton Centre at Cambridge. There is also a report of the Royal College of Physicians ‘Every breath we take. The lifelong impact of air pollution’ published in 2016 which is helpful in understanding the process of assessing health impact from air pollution.
Other estimates of premature death / death brought forward include the WHO who estimate that some 7 million people have their life ended prematurely because of exposure either through ambient or indoor exposure. The WHO estimates that the cost to European economies of disease and death associated with air pollution is of the order of US$ 1.6 trillion a year. The European Environment Agency, mirroring the WHO describes “air pollution is the single largest environmental health risk in Europe and the disease burden resulting from air pollution is substantial”. The EEA provides a European country death estimate (including ozone).
Advice from experts working in the field of air pollution and health is to describe deaths from air pollution as premature deaths or deaths brought forward due to exposure to adverse concentrations of air pollutants. Those most at risk are the elderly, the already ill or infirm and the very young. There is overlap between pollutants in the described effects on health. PM2.5 / PM 10 and NO2 have their individual estimates of life years lost and an estimated fraction that is shared.
Deaths brought forward by air pollution can be compared with deaths brought forward by road traffic collisions. The disease burden could also be compared with the numbers seriously or slightly injured. Air pollution has a bigger health burden than road traffic collisions.
Poor air quality is the largest environmental risk to public health in the UK, associated with short and longer term respiratory and cardiovascular problems. Approximately 40,000 premature deaths in England, or 300 in Bristol, can be attributed to NO2 and fine particulate matter pollution every year . Additionally, the most vulnerable members of society are often hit more by pollution creating and worsening health inequalities. Legally, concentrations of nitrogen dioxide (NO2) must not be more than 40 μg/m3 (microgrammes per metre cubed) as an annual mean (i.e. measured over a year). Yet across the UK there are many places that exceed these limits, including in Bristol.
A large part of Bristol is affected by air pollution in excess of UK and EU standards for nitrogen dioxide (NO2), which is extremely harmful to health. There are particularly high levels in the central area of Bristol where approximately 100,000 people live and many more study, work and travel through. It’s essential to have a plan to reduce pollution and improve the health of Bristol’s population.
There are two forms of air pollution we are concerned about and which we measure. The first is particulate matter (PM), referred to as PM10 and PM2.5, depending on the size of particles being measured. The second is nitrogen dioxide (NO2). Concentrations of both vary across the city and according to the season, the weather and the time of day (mostly due to changing traffic volumes).
PM and NO2 is monitored in Bristol at various locations across the city. The PM levels at our monitoring sites have been below the EU and UK limits for several years. However, the levels of NO2 currently exceed EU and UK limits.
The results from our monitoring work consistently show much higher levels of NO2 near busy roadsides, and lower levels away from roadsides and traffic, indicating a direct link between vehicle movements and air quality.
Like NO2 pollution, we know PM pollution is linked to poor health. By tackling NO2 pollution, we will also help lower PM levels.
Our predictions show that by 2021, there would still be 8 NO2 monitoring sites in Bristol that remain in breach of EU and UK limits if we don’t take action now. These predictions are based on NO2 concentrations averaged over a year (“annual mean”), and projected forward based on Defra’s future projections. They predict that without further action, Bristol would not meet legal limits until 2025.
Currently, some sites in Bristol experience NO2 levels of over 60µg/m3, which is more than 50% over the EU maximum limit of 40µg/m3.
This is to do with the alert levels set in the government’s Air Quality Index. They relate to short term (daily) predictions and measurements of air quality. These are important for people with respiratory health problems but not strongly related to the long – term health effects on the population from poor air quality that are represented by the annual mean measurements. So pollution levels in Bristol as measured by the air quality index can be low throughout the year, but we still breach the annual mean objective for nitrogen dioxide.
To understand the air quality problem in Bristol, we have collected data from an extensive monitoring network in the city. Bristol City Council monitors NO2 using a combination of automatic and non‐automatic (passive diffusion tube) monitoring.
In Bristol’s recent Annual Status Report for 2018, NO2 concentrations are shown to still be at a similar level to those measured in 2000. Trends in NO2 concentrations have shown some slight improvement over the last 5 years. At some locations in Bristol city centre, annual mean concentrations exceed 60 ug/m3 and widespread locations of exceedance of the annual mean objective for NO2 exist. The city centre NO2 measurements all exceed the Air Quality Objective. Many other parts of Bristol, especially near busy roads and in the city centre, exceed national objectives and European limit values for NO2.
For more detailed information on air quality monitoring, please read the Annual Status Report (ASR) published by Bristol City Council.
For current air quality information visit our Air Quality Dashboard
We are focusing on measures which will reduce the most harmful pollution affecting our communities but we will look at all options and investigate the most effective ways to reduce levels.
There are many sources of air pollution in Bristol, such as industrial sites, gas boilers and domestic wood burning stoves. However, the aim of the Plan is to reduce NO2 pollution within Bristol in the shortest amount of time since this is the pollutant that exceeds legal limits in Bristol. The dominant source of NO2 where people are exposed to pollution is road vehicles. Therefore, the focus of the current work will be on reducing emissions from vehicles, in order to achieve the aim of the Plan and improve air quality within the city in the shortest time. Other sources of pollution have been considered but are small contributors compared to vehicles.
Bristol only exceeds the legal compliance levels for NO2 and the government directive to the Council is focused on NO2 only. Therefore, measures proposed by the Plan will be designed specifically to tackle NO2. Some measures to reduce NO2 may also impact on levels of other pollutants, and any changes to particulate matter (PM) or CO2 concentrations due to this project will be identified within the technical assessment. Actions to reduce PM concentrations will be set out in the clean air plan.